Dockworkers have walked out of every major port on the US east and Gulf coasts, marking the beginning of a strike that could ripple through the world’s largest economy and cause political turmoil just weeks before the US presidential election.
The affected ports have the combined capacity to handle as much as half of all US trade volumes, and the strike would halt container cargo and auto shipments. Energy supplies and bulk cargo would not be affected. Some exceptions would be made to allow for the movement of military goods and cruise ships.
The significance of a work stoppage at every major container port from Houston to Miami and New York-New Jersey depends on how long the strike lasts. The economic loss from the shutdown, which began at 12:01 yesterday morning Eastern Standard Time, would be between US$3.8 billion and US$4.5 billion a day, according to JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Photo: Bloomberg
A backup resulting from a week-long strike would take about a month to clear, Grace Zwemmer at Oxford Economics said.
The International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) is seeking higher wages and a rollback of the language on automation in six-year contract that expired at midnight.
Union leader Harold Daggett has for months threatened a strike starting yesterday if no deal is reached before the deadline. The last time east and Gulf coast dockworkers went on strike was in 1977.
“We are prepared to fight as long as necessary, to stay out on strike for whatever period of time it takes,” Daggett said in a statement on Facebook.
The last offer from the companies “fell far short of what ILA rank-and-file members are demanding in wages and protections against automation,” he wrote.
The ocean carriers and terminal operators represented by the US Maritime Alliance have accused the ILA of refusing to negotiate since the union called off talks back in June. A strike was all but certain until Monday afternoon, when reports emerged that the White House has been in communication with the two sides over the weekend and some progress has been made on wages.
US President Joe Biden, who prides himself on being pro-union, has said the dispute is a matter for collective bargaining and he would not invoke his authority under national security laws to order dockworkers back to the ports while negotiations continue.
Trade, transportation and retail industry groups have been urging the White House to intervene to prevent or stop a strike.
“It would be unconscionable to allow a contract dispute to inflict such a shock to our economy,” US Chamber of Commerce CEO Suzanne Clark wrote in a letter to Biden on Monday.
“Taft-Hartley would provide time for both parties in negotiation to reach a deal on a new labor contract,” Clark wrote, referring to the 1947 congressional act that allows a president to intervene in labor disputes that involved national security.
Daggett has warned the White House not to intervene, and said if forced back to the ports, dockworkers would handle fewer containers than usual, slowing operations.
The union has not endorsed a presidential candidate, although according to Daggett, former US pesident Donald Trump “promised to support the ILA in its opposition to automated terminals” during a Mar-a-Lago meeting last fall.
Neither Trump nor US Vice President Kamala Harris has drawn public attention to the strike threat.
The flow of goods has already been impacted by the threat of disruption. Many importers brought their goods in early or through west coast ports to mitigate the risk. Port terminals up and down the coasts have been winding down operations ahead of the midnight deadline, and railroads are also pulling back service.
“The most important thing is going to be for the carriers, shippers and workers to come to terms,” US Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg on Bloomberg Television’s Balance of Power. “There’s really no substitute for the ports being up and running.”
Strike shuts ports on US east, Gulf coasts
