Recently inaugurated Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said he wants to station Japanese troops in Guam, for the first time since 1944. He also wants to realize his vision of an Asian NATO, with the US-Japan alliance as a foundation, expanded to a circle of friendly and like-minded nations. That vision would combine existing diplomatic and security pacts, including the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue of Japan, the US, Australia and India; the AUKUS security pact of Australia, the UK and the US; and the nascent rapprochement between Japan and South Korea.
China is not happy with these disruptive proposals, and Washington is not particularly impressed with the idea of an Asian NATO either, dismissing it as “hasty.” Even recently appointed Japanese Minister of Foreign Affairs Takeshi Iwaya yesterday told a news conference in Tokyo that it was “an idea for the future,” to consider in the mid-to-long term. Whether the ideas come to fruition, Ishiba’s new approaches to regional security are upsetting the apple cart.
There are two takeaways from the first days of Ishiba’s administration.
First, despite his reputation for being pro-China and intensely critical of the policies of late former Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe — who was perceived as pro-Taiwan and instrumental in changing Japan’s constitutional security posture from purely defensive to more pro-active — Ishiba is fully aware of the threat posed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and has had a close relationship with Taiwan in the past few years.
For the importance he places on defense, look at his Cabinet picks: Iwaya, with whom Ishiba has previously worked closely with, and Japanese Minister of Defense Gen Nakatani are both former defense ministers, as is Ishiba himself. The prime minister is retaining Yoshimasa Hayashi, top confidant to former Japanese prime minister Fumio Kishida, as his chief Cabinet secretary, signaling a degree of continuity with the previous administration. Hayashi is also a former defense minister.
Like Abe, Ishiba has argued for the removal of Article 9-2 of Japan’s constitution, which prohibits the Japanese Self-Defense Forces from having combat power. He also understands the importance of leveraging security alliances and pacts. Ishiba yesterday agreed with US President Joe Biden on a telephone call to continue bolstering the US-Japan alliance and building ties with mutual allies in the region.
The second takeaway is that among the continuity is considerable flux. Concerns that a previously pro-China Ishiba might not be willing to join coalitions clearly designed to address the CCP’s increased aggressiveness appear to be baseless. It is not Ishiba that has changed; it is the regional security situation. The CCP’s actions necessitate the evolution of the Japanese approach. Kishida, too, evolved from his pacifist, China-friendly instincts to consolidating Abe’s controversial constitutional changes on defense posture and on radically increasing Japan’s defense spending as a percentage of GDP.
Writing for Project Syndicate, former special adviser to Abe’s Cabinet Tomohiko Taniguchi said that Ishiba’s idea of an Asian NATO is a nonstarter, as the principle of collective defense encapsulated in NATO’s Article 5 would be unacceptable to the Japanese Diet and to many countries in the region, which would be wary of being locked into an obligation to defend Taiwan should the CCP come calling.
Nevertheless, nobody wants war, and effective deterrence is the name of the game. The trend is toward alliance building, as no one power in the region can stand up to the increasing might of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army. Close monitoring is exactly how this dynamic evolves, and Ishiba’s arrival demonstrates how a new face can throw new complications into the mix, while signaling continuity.
EDITORIAL: Ishiba holds course, with new ideas
